Economic Highlights
Economic highlights
3 min read
Investec Wealth & Investment (UK) is now part of Rathbones Group Plc. Find out what this means.
A bank holiday and the turn of the month meant that a few weeks have elapsed since the last Weekly Digest. A brief glimpse at market indices over the period would suggest that investors have been serenely enjoying another period where global aggregate equity indices have been making new all-time highs (mainly thanks to continued strength in the United States), but, as ever, there has been plenty going on to raise concerns. Last week’s monthly commentary focused on geopolitical risk and how we, as investors, deal with it. I didn’t get deep into the weeds of elections in large developed countries but did refer back to the Brexit referendum and Donald Trump’s victory in the 2016 US Presidential Election as events that “signalled a tectonic shift in the political economy”.
The tectonic plates shifted a little further last weekend. The epicentre of the latest quake was located in France, but tremors were also felt strongly in Germany. In the European Parliamentary elections, President Macron’s centrist Renaissance party and Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s centre-left Social Democratic Party were beaten by the more right wing National Rally (RN) and Alternative fűr Deutschland (AfD) parties. Indeed, these two parties are often labelled as “far right”, mainly owing to their strong opposition to immigration.
Having said that, the more extreme parties did not have it all their own way. The largest share of German votes went to the conservative Christian Democratic Party, and far right candidates in Poland, Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden failed to meet their various parties’ expectations. Furthermore, the current ruling coalition, the European People’s Party, retained its majority in the European Parliament. And so, for now, the status quo ante remains.
Europe has had previous scares. The election of Giorgia Meloni, leader of the Brothers of Italy (FdI), as Prime Minister, was of great concern. One only has to read the thumbnail of FdI’s Wikipedia entry to get a flavour of what the party is about: “Academics and observers have variously described it as conservative, national-conservative, right-wing populist, social-conservative, nationalist, neo-fascist, post-fascist, nativist and anti-immigrant.” My guess is that the more left wing the observer or academic, the more right wing they would view the FdI as being, and so one has to be careful of talking such labels at face value, but it is certainly clear on which side of the political spectrum it lies.
Or is it? The descriptor that is not included in the aforementioned list, but which is widely applied to the FdI, RN and the AfD is “populist”. Over the last few years, “populism” has become a catch-all word used to describe any political movement that deviates far from the traditional “centre”. It is an emotive word (and deliberately so), in that it brings to mind mass rallies in support of charismatic (and ultimately despotic) leaders who have, in the past, led Europe into tragic conflict, or, in the case of several leaders in Latin America, economic disarray.
Populist policies can be drawn from either side of the political spectrum. Anti-immigration policies are usually associated with the far right, whereas wealth redistribution is generally the preserve of the far left (socialists). A skilled populist leader can cherry pick policies from anywhere on the menu to tap into the concerns of the electorate or to play on their fears. The right plays on fears of “immigrants stealing jobs” or the gradual dilution of once-strong native cultural identities. The left focuses on wealth inequality and “fat cat” business leaders and promises to redress the balance. Neither mentions the need for skilled immigrants to make up for the lack of natural labour force growth in maturing developed economies, nor the benefits of proper incentives to deliver investment and innovation in largely capitalist societies. The ideology trumps the practical business of actually running a country for the benefit of the majority of its population.
That’s not to say that there is not a kernel of truth in the arguments of more populist leaders. At the very highest level, thirty years of globalisation have had a profound effect on the jobs market, especially in mass manufacturing and in the sorts of clerical jobs that can be outsourced to take advantage of cheap labour on the other side of the world. Financial markets have increasingly valued capital much more highly than labour. Monetary policy following the Global Financial Crisis has accelerated the wealth generation of those who already had wealth, while making it even harder for those aspiring to wealth to catch up. These trends were already evident even before the Covid pandemic and then Russia’s invasion of Ukraine increased the gaps even further.
If this makes it seem as though some sort of revolution is on the horizon, I am not trying to sound alarmist. A decade or so ago, Greece was threatening to split from Europe and was pretty much bankrupt. Today, its economy is thriving, and it has become a paragon of virtue in terms of things like collecting taxes from people who owe them. Admittedly, it had to go a through an existential crisis to get here, but it was amazing how its populist leaders, once in power, engaged in more “sensible” policymaking. In Italy, too, the Meloni administration has not met the market’s worst fears.
None of that stopped markets from reacting negatively to the initial news of the results when they opened on Monday. The main casualties were French bonds and equities. France’s benchmark 10-year bond yield jumped from 3.09% to 3.22%. This was not a crisis by any means, but signalled investors’ concerns. France’s CAC-40 Index opened around 2% down and has continued to drift lower. Within the equity market, the biggest losers have been the leading banks, seen as easy targets for windfall taxes owing to their current strong profitability. At Tuesday’s market close, shares in Société Général were down 12% from Friday, while those of BNP Paribas were down 8%. The worries were also reflected in a one cent fall in the euro versus the pound and the dollar – handy for anyone heading to the Continent for their summer holidays.
To add to the uncertainty, President Macron decided to call a snap election in France’s lower house of Parliament. This is the arm of France’s legislature that controls the domestic agenda. Whatever happens there, Macron will remain President with control over foreign policy and defence, both of which are massively important given the current global geopolitical situation (although the market was buffeted yesterday by rumours that he had resigned).
Investors tend to mark out their calendar with political events such as elections, and one can often see higher levels of volatility priced into options markets well ahead of time; some sort of “risk premium” is built into prices far in advance. When elections are called out of the blue, markets have to reprice the risk accordingly, hence the sudden shift on Monday and Tuesday. Now we will be in limbo until July 7th when the result of the election is known. Even then, it is not certain how things will turn out. Macron has effectively called the electorate’s bluff. Do the people really want RN in control or were they just protesting in a vote that, ultimately, didn’t shift the balance of power in Brussels? Remember that Prime Minister David Cameron played much the same card following the success of UKIP in European and local elections with dramatic consequences. The current betting is that some sort of coalition will keep RN out of power even if it wins the largest number of seats, but you can see how this could all get very messy.
The greater threat to the political status quo lies ahead of us in 2027 with the next (scheduled) French Presidential election. I recall presenting at an event in 2017 with the political commentator John Hulsman. He correctly identified the increasingly “populist” direction of politics in the developed world. He was pretty sure that Marine le Pen, the leader of National Rally, would not prevail in the 2017 election, and he said that she would get closer to power but still fail in 2022. However, he thought her chances were at least 50/50 in 2027, especially as by then Macron would not be allowed to run again and there was nobody whom he could identify that could fill Macron’s shoes (and I’m not sure that he will have identified anyone even now).
An awful lot of water will flow under the bridge over the next three years, but it’s probably worth marking April 2027 into your diary now as a potentially explosive moment in European politics. In the last two elections, France’s two-round system of voting which puts the two leading candidates into a run-off has worked in favour of the more mainstream candidate in that voters shied away from the more radical alternative. If RN does gain some sort of control in France this July, then it has almost three years to prove it can act responsibly. It’s going to be a fascinating period for anyone interested in politics, but less comfortable for investors, one suspects.
Economic highlights
3 min read
Please speak with your Investment Manager or Financial Planner, or find their details on our Contact Us page.
We have a team dedicated to supporting people like you. Please get in touch to discuss your financial needs today.
The information in this document is believed to be correct but cannot be guaranteed. Opinions, interpretations and conclusions represent our judgment as of this date and are subject to change. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The value of assets such as property and shares, and the income derived from them, may fall as well as rise. When investing your capital is at risk. Copyright Investec Wealth & Investment Limited. Reproduction is prohibited without permission.
Investec Wealth & Investment (UK) is a trading name of Investec Wealth & Investment Limited which is a subsidiary of Rathbones Group Plc. Investec Wealth & Investment Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in England. Registered No. 2122340. Registered Office: 30 Gresham Street. London. EC2V 7QN.