Weekly Digest: the big one?
02 Jul 2020
Residents of Los Angeles and San Francisco live in fear of “The Big One”, the long-awaited, possibly overdue, earthquake that will be caused by a readjustment of the tectonic plates that meet along the San Andreas fault which runs through much of California.
I have already used all of this year’s Weekly Digests to discuss the topics of market valuation, the threat of rising interest rates and bond yields and the strong momentum in the global economy and corporate earnings. Like seismologists with an ear to the ground, we have been listening for the early warning signs of a more volatile period for asset prices. It finally came upon us last week, but so far is still in the “tremor” category rather than anything more serious. So is it time to hide? Our first instinct is: not necessarily. Even falls of a few more percent would not be catastrophic and only take equity markets back to where they were a few weeks ago. Indeed, blowing a bit of froth off the top of the market would be seen as quite healthy. One reason, perhaps, why equities sold off a bit more dramatically on Friday was because of a call from a prominent strategist at Bank of America, citing the fact that his proprietary contrarian sentiment indicator was now flashing “sell”. Finally, the market had just become too euphoric and gains were too readily made.
The publication of his call coincided with another strong employment report in the US, one that showed an acceleration in wage growth. As I have discussed previously, faster wage growth is seen as a key lead indicator of higher inflation in the prices of goods and services. Thus, encouraged by comments from the latest Federal Reserve meeting that appeared to endorse another interest rate rise in March, bond investors hit the “sell” button, sending the yield of the 10-year Treasury bond over 2.8%. Almost a year ago, the last time that the bond markets were selling off more aggressively, I discussed the debate about the impact of rising bond yields on other assets, notably equities. The broad consensus was that there are two key risks. The first was the level of yields, and most strategists were of the opinion that equities would not come under great pressure until the US 10-year yield rose to at least 3%, and more probably to 3.25%. Taking into account the subsequent rise in equity markets combined with the growth in corporate earnings, the general view is that those levels still prevail. The other factor that would be of concern was the pace of the rise in yields, and I think it is the speed of the current rise that is unnerving investors more. Bond investors in aggregate do not appear to be positioned for a surprise tick-up in inflation. So we certainly understand the current bout of nerves, but this does not necessarily point to the development of a bear market for equities (defined by a fall of 20% or more from the peak).
|FTSE 100 Weekly Winners|
|Smurfitt Kappa Group||1.7%|
|FTSE 100 Weekly Losers|
|Berkeley Group Holdings||-5.3%|
|Royal Dutch Shell Class B||-5.1%|
However - and aren’t there always exceptions that prove the rule in financial markets? – we did find two bear markets that occurred with no recession in sight. The first was in 1963, around the time of the Bay of Pigs invasion when there was a real threat of nuclear war in the air. Does that sound familiar? Escalation of tensions in the Korean Peninsula cannot be discounted, but is a separate issue to what we have discussed so far. The second non-recessionary bear market was in 1987, when the market crashed in October. As discussed at the time of last year’s thirty-year anniversary, that fall was exacerbated by the use of “portfolio insurance” programmes. There are echoes of that risk today in the form of all manner of computer-driven trading, a huge outstanding “short volatility” position, and the uncertain influence of Exchange Traded Funds in a falling market. These all raise the possibility of an overshoot to the downside, but, on fundamentals alone, there is insufficient reason to say that “The Big One” has started. To be continued…
Finally, the Battle of Mengo Hill took place in Uganda. This week, the nickname of which Ugandan national sports team is the Silverbacks?
Year-to-date market performance
FTSE 100 Index, past 12 months
Past performance is no indicator of future performance
This newsletter is for professional financial advisers only and is not intended to be a financial promotion for retail clients. The information in this document is for private circulation and is believed to be correct but cannot be guaranteed. Opinions, interpretations and conclusions represent our judgement as of this date and are subject to change. The Company and its related Companies, directors, employees and clients may have positions or engage in transactions in any of the securities mentioned. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The value of shares, and the income derived from them, may fall as well as rise. The information contained in this publication does not constitute a personal recommendation and the investment or investment services referred to may not be suitable for all investors. Copyright Investec Wealth & Investment Limited. Reproduction prohibited without permission.
Member firm of the London Stock Exchange. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Investec Wealth & Investment Limited is registered in England.
Registered No. 2122340. Registered Office: 2 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7QP.