Unearthing opportunities in mining

Podcast transcript: scroll to the areas that interest you

• IR: Iman Rappetti, journalist and host
• FM: Fanele Mondi, CEO of Energy Intensive Users Group
• AG: Ayan Ghosh, Head: Cross-Asset Investment Strategy, Investec
• QA: Quentin Allison, head of Commodities Structuring & Trading, Investec

00:00: Intro

IR: The world is in a race to transition from fossil fuels to sustainable energy solutions, and while there are a number of options on the table that will help us move to net zero, there is one essential piece of the puzzle that is, ironically, not known for its environmental credentials and that is mining.

South Africa's biggest contributor to GDP, and employer of hundreds of thousands, the mining sector faces the simultaneous challenges of evolving into an environmentally responsible corporate citizen while trying to maintain its status as a vital cog in the country's economy.

Mining is already leading the charge when it comes to the generation of renewable energy. According to the Minerals Council SA, 7.5GW of the planned 10.4GW from over 100 private sector renewable projects comes from the mines. If successful, the current private sector pipeline will be able to generate nearly half of Eskom's operational capacity.

In addition to decarbonising its own operations, the South African mining sector faces a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to capitalise on the global demand for rare minerals and metals needed to manufacture batteries for electric vehicles, solar panels and wind turbines. And indeed for other green technologies that are critical to carbon capture and the hydrogen market.

It's clear that moving away from its legacy and into a sustainable future presents many challenges for the mining sector - but there are also many opportunities.

Welcome to The Current - an Investec Focus Radio series that delves into South Africa’s energy transition. Over 10 episodes we explore the country’s energy crisis, and how we can collectively shape a resilient and sustainable energy future. I’m your host, Iman Rappetti, and in this series, I’ll be talking to industry experts, from inside Investec and beyond, about how South Africa can keep the lights on while moving towards more equitable and sustainable energy solutions.

So far in this series, we've had an overview of South Africa’s energy transition, and have taken a look at the most pressing issues at Eskom. In this, the third episode, we're tackling a sector-specific topic: how mining can play its part in the energy transition. Let’s welcome my guests…

FM: I am Fanele Mondi, the CEO of Energy Intensive Users Group, also known as EIUG for short.

AG: I'm Ayan Ghosh. I cover investment strategy at Investec.

QA: I'm Quentin Allison. I head up the commodity structuring and trading business at Investec. 

02:37: The energy trilemma

We start with Fanele, and a look at the Energy Intensive Users Group.

FM: We are an advocacy group which is member driven in terms of influencing the policy and its implementation in South Africa. Our members are, as the name implies, large power users in the country which constitutes about 40 percent of electricity of South Africa. We have members in the mining space as well as heavy manufacturing. Typically we're talking your Sasols, Anglo Americans, South 32, Sibanya, et cetera.

We are interested in what is normally called the energy trilemma: it's about affordability of electricity, security of electricity the quality of electricity and the decarbonisation of our power systems., which is really about the environmental aspects of energy.

Without energy security, we're not going to get investments in the country, as well as even on the operating plants. You'll start seeing them closing down. In terms of affordability, it's equally important. Most of our members, especially around mining and heavy manufacturing they built their facilities on the premise that we had the cheapest electricity in the world at the time. So if we get out of that space where we become the most expensive, that is going to be a huge challenge.

The third part is the competitiveness in global markets. With our high carbon intensive electricity, that is going to put us in a disadvantage. So it is important, therefore, that as we transition, we take into account all of these aspects and develop a plan that is suitable for our country, it's suitable for its people, it's suitable for our economy.

Our members in the EIUG have advocated quite strongly to the government to allow private sector to do their own projects on electricity. And luckily that was granted to us. As a result, we have quite a good pipeline of projects. At some point we had I think that was end of last year, almost 10,000 megawatts which were in the planning phases with close to 3,500 which is most likely to be achievable within the next five years or so.

04:53: Just transition and how to manage the loss of jobs from coal mining

IR:  When it comes to the mining sector's impact on the energy transition, there are a number of factors to consider. It's not just about which resources will help South Africa move towards a sustainable future, but how the journey towards net zero might impact broader society. In episode 1 of this series, Investec's Samantha Mooi stressed the importance of the energy transition being centred around people - and people in the mining context means jobs.

Fanele, the coal industry is a major employer in South Africa. One of the key concerns about decarbonising the power system is that it will have serious socioeconomic impacts. So how can the energy transition be done in a just manner?

FM: I think it is true for starters that coal is one of the biggest contributors in terms of the GDP in the country, especially within the mining sector which I think is estimated somewhere around about 250 billion Rand, in terms of sales.

So it is quite significant. In terms of employment, it's equally significant we're talking close to a hundred thousand, people who are directly employed by the coal mining sector. That excludes those who work for Eskom, who work in those power stations - just the mining part of it.

And if you consider that out of the, I think it's about 230 megawatts which we produce in South Africa, half of that is used by Eskom. So there is a problem in terms of how then do we create employment for all of those people? The renewable sector will create jobs, both in terms of the building part of it, as well as a little bit in terms of operations.

But what will be important is to establish some of these manufacturing facilities in the country where we can start creating permanent jobs. And then the question then that follows, will they replace the hundred thousand? My sense is that it's probably not possible. So one of the major things that needs to be considered is the upskilling of people so that they can be able to do other jobs.

07:00: Energy transition happening at a slow pace

IR: While Ayan agrees that the need for upskilling is paramount, he believes that coal mining won’t be switched off overnight.

AG: I'm hopeful that we do have time on our side. And what I do think is that this energy transition story will be far slower than anticipated. And the job losses will be very slow. And the reasons for that is if you look into the wind and the solar generation globally, it exceeded nuclear energy for the first time in 2021. If you look at projected renewable energy capacity additions over the next five years, that's around 2. 5 gigawatts. That's similar to the prior 20 years. Global energy use still is 80 percent reliant on fossil fuels and the global measure for fossil fuels has declined by only 5 percent since 2005.

So all of this being said, while I do worry about job losses and we should keep an eye on this and we do need to upskill. What I do think is that this transition process will be far slower and the job losses will hopefully be far slower in South Africa. But I think the technology is evolving and hopefully we have time on our side to resolve for the crisis.

08:09: The promise of Platinum Group Metals (PGMs)

IR: The technology to which Ayan is referring revolves largely around PGMs, or Platinum Group Metals. Taking up just 6 of the 118 spots on the Periodic Table, these metals hold the potential to accelerate the move towards a green energy.

Quentin, Platinum Group Metals are considered an alternative in achieving global energy transition goals. What PGMs and what are their unique properties that can serve as a catalyst in generating electricity?

QA: The metal subset PGMs are basically platinum, palladium, ruthenium, iridium, rhodium, and osmium. And these metals have unique catalytic properties. The first one being that they are chemically stable, so they're resistant to oxidation and corrosion.

Secondly, they can actually fit into porous areas which in the catalyst is hugely beneficial. If the PGMs can actually fit in the gaps in the catalyst, there's more surface area for chemical reactions, so they're more efficient. The third thing with regards to PGMs that makes them attractive is their electro- catalytic properties, which essentially means that they are efficient at converting chemical energy into electrical energy.

And then they have a tolerance to reaction conditions. So when you have a chemical reaction, it's pretty harsh, a lot of heat, some acidity, some humidity. So it's quite a harsh environment and these PGMs are well suited to operating efficiently in this environment.

IR: So what's the role of PGMs in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, especially when we think about tackling global warming?

QA: They're used in catalytic converters for engines. That's the predominant use of PGMs today. And in a combustion engine, you typically have carbon monoxide, for instance, as a direct result of the combustion process.

Having a PGM catalyst in there can actually switch the carbon monoxide into carbon dioxide, which is more environmentally friendly. And It's not just that they reduce the harmful emissions into the atmosphere. having PGMs actually makes combustion engines more fuel efficient.

Carbon capture is a big theme now in PGMs. And that's the way we actually talk about taking carbon dioxide that exists in the atmosphere and actually take it out.

We've got a good example, a fertiliser producer in South Africa effectively in the fertiliser production process, they emit nitric oxide into the atmosphere. And they've actually added a catalyst in that industrial process. That catalyst recaptures the nitric oxide before it goes into the atmosphere and makes the whole process cleaner.

There's a PGM application there that you wouldn't have typically foreseen. And this client actually financially benefits from that process because the Capex that they invested in the project to recapture the nitric oxide allows them to raise carbon credits, which they sell into the market to raise capital.

You can also take that carbon, you can convert it into synfuels, potentially chemicals, polymers. And those have some economic downstream benefit, so it's a very exciting option that's related to PGMs there.

IR: Our conversation with Fanele, Ayan and Quentin will continue after this.

10:56: Investec's Commodity Hedging and Working Capital Solutions

Are you looking for a partner to help you navigate the volatile commodities landscape? Investec’s Commodity Hedging and Working Capital Solutions team can identify opportunities and structure investment alternatives across both traditional commodity assets and exciting frontier markets like regulated carbon allowances. Whether you’re interested in battery or precious metals, base metals, energy resources or agriculture, we have a commodity investment solution for your portfolio. Find out more by clicking on the podcast notes, or search for “Investec Commodity Hedging”.

11:20: How clean are PGMs, really?

IR: While they may seem like a rhodium-plated bullet, PGMs currently face some harsh realities in their path to being a fixture on the energy mix. From the outset, their credentials as an eco-friendly option are tarnished by the fact that their extraction, like coal, is a dirty business. Quentin explains.

QA: Obviously, coal mining does consume a lot of diesel; a lot of carbon goes into the atmosphere when you burn the coal downstream. It's famously negative for the environment.

PGMs also consume potentially a lot of diesel, particularly with open pit mines. So they can be dirty, it's just the reality of the business they operate in. There's no way around it.

What they can do and what we have seen in South Africa is they know they pollute X amount of tons of carbon, they could potentially go and buy carbon offsets via one of the gold standard, for instance, or Vera-certified emission reduction programs, and actually thereby offset the carbon that they are putting into the atmosphere, which does clean up the operation for them without directly changing the nature of their business.. 

12:19: EVs are eating PGM's lunch

IR: And then there are the current market realities around PGMs. Despite reaching historic highs in 2021 and 2022, the current picture is less impressive - rather ironically, its lack-lustre performance is directly linked to one of its strengths.

QA: The PGM sector is in a lot of strife, and it's largely driven actually on the back of EVs. As the world switches from combustion engines to EV, it effectively means there's less demand for PGMs because there are no PGMs used in EV. So the feeling at the moment is that's really what's dragging mining share prices down.

 We have to find some new demand for PGMs to actually stimulate these mines to produce more, because we know they're going to need it in the long term.

These mines are struggling at the moment purely because of the low PGM prices that they're ultimately receiving. The reality is that switch from combustion to EV is taking a little bit longer than people anticipated.

So we're hoping that allows these mines to survive. Over the next five years, we're probably going to be in a scenario where there is a lack of demand for PGMs.

13:15: PGMs and hydrogen fuel energy

IR: So... PGMs aren't necessarily environmentally friendly to mine, nor are they in great demand. Which begs the question: why are some framing this particular resource as a key element of the energy transition? Well, two major factors are abundance, and the technologies involved in hydrogen power - more specifically, how they rely on PGMs.

The first point: South Africa is world's second largest producer of palladium, and the largest producer fo platinum, ahead of Russia, Canada and the US. There are about 70 000 metric tons of platinum worldwide, and about 63 000 metric tons come from under the South African soil. And it's not just about what's been mined so far. Quentin explains.

QA: There's still a massive amount of reserves underground. So it's a hugely significant contributor to South African GDP. It creates a lot of jobs in this country. And also it's very important to our international stakeholders. You've got foreign industry manufacturing that rely on South African PGMs in those processes.

They need our production and what you actually see in particular in the platinum market is these guys look at South African production in order to predict pricing and literally prices will change based on our production estimates.

IR: So we can be influential in the market as well.

QA: 100 percent correct, yeah.

IR: The second point: producing hydrogen. Without wanting to regress too far back into high school science classes, hydrogen production is done using electrolysis. Electrolysis requires catalysts. And the catalysts used in hydrogen production are more often than not one of the PGMs. Here's a practical example from Quentin.

QA: When you take, for instance, green hydrogen, you're effectively cracking water into the hydrogen-oxygen component. That requires a lot of energy. And so using a PGM catalyst in that process is one of the benefits of the product.

IR: Hydrogen is an energy carrier, rather than an energy source, able to store and transport energy produced from renewables like wind and solar, which South Africa has in abundance.

Quentin explains what the country's prospects in the hydrogen economy look like.

QA: So it's basically a future economic system where hydrogen is the key energy carrier. And what we're talking about here is effectively hydrogen plays a role in transportation, industry, power generation.

Green hydrogen is the most popular one that's discussed at the moment, but there are other forms: pink hydrogen, which is derived from nuclear energy, blue hydrogen from natural gas, you've got black hydrogen from coal.

But green hydrogen in South Africa is a huge opportunity largely because we have a lot of wind and we have a lot of space for solar, so renewables are critical in that process.

Effectively what happens is renewable energy or electricity is used in the electrolysers to break up water into hydrogen into oxygen, and then that hydrogen is transported to a different destination. And then once you have the hydrogen, you can actually use it in a fuel cell. And in fuel cells you also use PGMs right, where you convert hydrogen into electricity.

What we're talking about here is effectively replacing fossil fuel energy consumption with hydrogen fuel consumption. And that process, the guys are projecting by 2050, we hopefully hit net zero to do that.

We probably need somewhere between 10 and 20 percent of our total energy consumption coming from that. So it's a big number and hugely important to us.

16:27: South Africa's potential as a leader in the hydrogen economy

IR: So Ayan, there we are. South Africa is the largest producer of platinum in the world. Do you think that as a country we have the potential to become a global leader of the hydrogen economy?

AG: The way I would put it is various studies suggest that Africa, including South Africa, along with India, Chile, has some of the best potential and the scale to produce green hydrogen at the lowest cost. What worries me, however, is some of these green hydrogen projections for Africa are very optimistic. For example, if you look into the Africa Green Hydrogen Alliance, which is an initiative launched at COP26, I think the alliance member country including Egypt, Kenya, Morocco, Namibia, South Africa would require a huge investment of $450 billion to $900 billion of investment by 2050.

And to put this in context, some studies would suggest that Australia needs to build a staggering 228 gigawatt of new energy, solar and wind capacity in order to power the electrolysers that hydrogen developers have proposed within its borders.

That's 13 times its current installed capacity of 17 gigawatts, that requires an investment close to five times that it's done over the last. 18 years.

So all I'm trying to argue is I think it's still early days, and I think without adequate government support and without adequate funding, this looks like a challenge for now.

IR: If we are, however, able to scale up the production of green hydrogen, what are South Africa’s chances of becoming a leading exporter of the gas?

AG: I think there are a few challenges as we speak. So firstly, transporting green hydrogen from Africa is still a conundrum. I think what we've heard recently is in 2020, Siemens inaugurated the first industrial scale solar driven green hydrogen facility in the Middle East in Dubai.

But also, Siemens has specifically said there's no immediate plans to engage in Africa on renewable hydrogen, and that's given concerns around political stability.

The other way to develop or to become an exporter is can we develop a pipeline between Africa and Europe or to different parts of the world? But the question here is we need a lot of financial muscle and a lot of investment for such infrastructure to play out.

IR: For Ayan, there is a benefit for every South African in improved demand for PGMs.

AG: I think green hydrogen as we speak the technology is evolving, and it's hugely important for South Africa because it can really put a support on platinum and PGM prices, which are very depressed at this point of time.

I think the best proxy for the Rand from a terms of trade perspective is PGM prices minus oil prices, so if PGM prices do recover, I'm very hopeful that the Rand will also recover.

It does make a difference for all of us, and I do think that's exactly why it's very important to keep an eye on where this green hydrogen technology goes from here, and if we are ahead in the race in terms of hydrogen production, exports, and PGM prices.

IR: If demand for green hydrogen expands, South Africa stands on the verge of what could be a big upswing in PGM demand; but there's another group of locally abundant metals that, like PGMs, play an important role in sustainable energy.

20:58: Other clean metals in the green energy transition

IR: So Ayan, outside of PGMs are there any other critical minerals and metals that have a role to play in energy transition?

AG: Some of these critical minerals, which include cobalt, copper, iridium, manganese, nickel, , they're all used in the production of these wind turbine magnets, nuclear reactors, photovoltaics, EVs. They're all very key to this whole global energy transition process that we are seeing.

IR: The challenge is that many of these non-PGM minerals and metals are mined in some of the more risky corners of the world, which opens up an opportunity for South Africa – if we’re willing to put money into finding them.

AG: I think the important point to make here is that the reliability of supply remains a concern, especially because these minerals come from sources where there are geopolitical risks.

As a result of which, I do think that for South Africa to seize this opportunity, we need to get more funding to fund exploration of critical minerals, and the IDC, that's the Industrial Development Corporation with, in partnership with the DMRE, they've established a 400 million fund for mining exploration in South Africa.

And that's specifically to look at exploration of the critical minerals. So I think we're going in the right direction on this. 

21:14: Nuclear energy in SA's energy mix

IR: Another non-PGM that's coming to the fore is uranium, and South Africa's Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy has recently called for the country to produce its own yellow cake, a by-product of uranium processing that can be used to produce nuclear energy.

Fanele, what are your thoughts on the contentious subject of nuclear?

FM: We only have one station now, Koeberg. And when you look at the current IRP plan, there is a scenario where you could have more nuclear. I think at most by 2040, they are talking, I think, 4,000. Megawatts. I think that's what they are proposing. And then later on, another 16,000 or so.

But that's looking at 2040 and 2050 period. So in terms of that mining then for domestic use I think there's limited opportunities at the moment, but certainly from an international perspective, I think we've got an opportunity to export uranium.

We have one of the best, resources in terms of uranium. And we are seeing an uptake in other countries. I understand, for instance, France, they've got a clear plan in terms of increasing their nuclear capacity. So in an international market, probably there is opportunities.

IR: Your thoughts, Quentin?

QA: Yeah I'm 100 percent in the camp on the uranium side. I think it's the cleanest fuel. I think it gets a lot of bad publicity. I think we should be investing in it. I think there is an opportunity to export.

Obviously, you've got to be careful around, the security concerns around exporting uranium. So as long as you can tick that box, I think certainly a very exciting opportunity for us. But like Fanele said, I think the infrastructure development and CAPEX required to set these facilities up takes a long time. 

Mining obviously has to play its part in ensuring that South Africa is as well placed as possible to take advantage of the immense potential that PGMs have to play in sustainable energy. But the opportunity is there for the taking.

AG: While this is a huge opportunity, it requires huge investment. I think the government should showcase to the world that we are increasingly going into a very stable political backdrop for foreigners to invest into this country. I think one needs to have confidence to invest here and that will possibly get us ahead in leaps and bounds. 

23:34: Will the hydrogen economy be a game changer for SA?

QA: I think the hydrogen economy could be potentially a game changer for South Africa. At this point in time, the green energy is not competing on a price level with the fossil fuels. But obviously now things are changing, right? So if I look at particularly in the Eurozone, Investec is very active in the carbon trading mechanism in the Eurozone.

And what that effectively does is it creates a financial cost to industry for polluting, right? That's going to precipitate to the rest of the world, I hope.

And there you may start to see that the cost benefit of fossil fuels versus green energy starts to balance and creates the equilibrium that you need to make this market more competitive. So I think it's a big opportunity for us.

IR: Thanks for listening to this episode of The Current, brought to you by Investec Focus Radio. In our next episode, we're focusing on the investment opportunities presented by the energy transition.

You can find all episodes of this series at investec.com/thecurrent, or wherever you get your podcasts. If you enjoyed this episode, please rate it, leave a comment and forward it to your friends and colleagues. 

17:04: The potential of natural gas as an alternative power sources

IR: Campbell, other countries rely on gas as a cleaner source to generate electricity. Will there be a point where we can see South Africa having a well-functioning gas power sector for low carbon energy transition?

CP: Gee, I'd like to think we'll get to that at some point, but frankly, right now, without the right fiscal framework, it's quite hard to see that happening. 

We need, you know, international expertise to extract or find and extract the gas and, that right fiscal framework to monetise it in the interest of all stakeholders. It's really about stakeholders, not just the hands of a select few. 

So, I'm a little cynical. I think that there's a lot that needs to be done on our gas resource, which let me say is plentiful. But I believe that we need all types of energies. 

There's a certain myopia in other countries of the world - just in looking exclusively at renewable options, throwing the baby out with the bath water on coal and oil and gas and fossil fuels, the transition should happen slowly. 

My travels to China have clearly shown them to be of the mindset that, well, yes, we're going to really ramp up renewables and anyone who knows, you know, how much they're putting on the ground. It's absolutely amazing the amount of renewable infrastructure they're putting on the ground while at the same time building out coal and fossil fuels. 

And they've gone on record to say that at some point when we have enough of the new, we can switch off the old. And I quite like that…

18:24: The time for implementation is now

IR: So, let's maybe pivot a little bit to look at the future. Again, this is the starting point in a journey of conversations, which I hope are going to be able to provide more of the granular detail around some of the strategies and the plans. But to come back to you, Chris, what next?

CH: I think we need to recognise that we've already made massive progress in allowing the private sector as a start to generate electricity for themselves, decentralised electricity generation, and two, as we've discussed earlier, already our international commitments. 

So I think the key part of what's next is ensuring that we meet our current plans, our current obligations, not that we need new ones at this point, we need to ensure that we continue with what we've done, but there's already a lot underway, and I think we need to allow time for the private sector to come through and invest to solve the electricity crisis. 

And then at that point, you know, give it a bit of time, we'll have to review and see where we are and maybe we need a hand on the tiller. 

But I think we do need to pause and reflect on the significant progress that's already been made over the past couple of years.

19:29: What do we need to achieve in the next 10 years?

IR: James, over to you, what is your view of the future?

JM: I do think that the Eskom turnaround plan is making a difference. And so there is a significant investment, very focused at a power station level with a lot of decentralisation of accountability and authority. So procurement, people issues, technical issues. 

And for us to get out of loadshedding, we actually are going to have to extend the use of coal-fired power stations, just because we haven’t built enough clean technology in the way that we said we would. 

So if we want to talk about what do we need to do by 2030 or even 10 years, 2034, we need to put the hammer down on public auctions around wind and solar. 

We are seeing, largely because of loadshedding, a big response out of rooftop solar. It’s been phenomenal. You know, we’ve now got about five gigs of installed rooftop, and the corporate utility sort of market, which is where the banks and Investec, you know, very, very active, that has also had an amazing response.

So our view as the Energy Council, we will double the amount of wind and solar brought online from 23 to 24, and we'll pretty much double that again from 24 to 25. 

So we're getting to about four gigs a year of sustainable wind and solar coming online. What we've got to pair that with is, as Campbell said, we need a lot of gas to power on the system. We need a lot more storage in the system. 

20:47: What impact will the energy transition have on jobs?

IR: So Sam, as James is talking, what I'm thinking about is the people, the stakeholders, the actual warm bodies that have to make all of these things possible. 

In this just energy transition story, where do people fit in from an engagement and also a sustainability perspective?

SM: Right in the centre. They fit right in the centre. The just energy transition cannot happen unless you're thinking about the people at the centre of it. 

Because we're such a, carbon-intensive economy there's a lot of jobs attached to that carbon intensity. So how do we shift those jobs, the people in those jobs, towards a cleaner energy or into cleaner energy jobs, green jobs. That has to be part of the conversation right at the beginning.

IR: Chris, I know one of the things you're concerned about is around jobs displacement in the transition to cleaner energy. The fate of these coal towns and thousands of people depending on the plants for jobs. Is the energy transition able to address job creation in South Africa?

CH: Yeah, it's a tricky one to answer. We have seen this sort of situation before many times through economies over time as new technologies come through and make jobs redundant.

We've got about 90,000 people or so involved in coal mining in South Africa. So it's a very valid question. What happens to those people as we transition away? Are we able to re-skill those individuals to find jobs elsewhere? 

But the flip side of that question too is we've got a vast number of people outside of the labour market at this point. People seeking employment that are unable to find it. 

Our economy has not grown at a sufficient pace to ensure that we materially reduce unemployment in South Africa. 

And so we almost need to see this as an opportunity to grow the economy. If we do it right, we reduce those, the cost of capital, increase access to international markets, and as a result, we grow the economy. 

So, we may well have these 90,000 people's livelihoods put at risk and we'll have a process around that I'm sure to reskill those individuals. But at the same time, we'll have opportunities for millions of other people, if we get this right, and the economy grows at 3 percent instead of 1%, and I think that needs to be put in the mix as well.

IR: What you say is so important because I think with everything especially big problems, you almost have to apply a different lens. And what you're saying is, well, we might lose that on the, on the swings, what can we gain on the merry-go-round with the same group of people? 

Could that skilling and that transfer of skills be, be done, quickly enough to not leave them in the lurch? What's your thinking?

CH: As I say, it's been done many times before, and it's a process that economies and people have gone through, through generations in economies across the globe. And typically, it's the case that new technological development leads to more employment rather than less. 

So, there may well be a difficult phase as we embark this, but history suggests it, if anything, it leads to greater employment, greater growth going forward rather than the other way around.

23:40: Affordability of renewable energy

IR: And Chris, what about affordability? The one issue is supply and us being able to have electricity when it’s needed, and the other is affordability. 

We've seen increases, exponential increases in, the price of power over the years. How does South Africa find the balance between producing energy that’s sustainable but also affordable?

CH: I can refer to my own personal experience. We installed solar and batteries probably about a year or so ago. And we financed that through our home loans. We just took an extra bit on our home loan and now we pay interest on that. And the interest payment on that loan is roughly equivalent to the reduction in our electricity cost. 

So, for my monthly expenses, for myself as an individual, it was cash flow neutral from day one. Pay a bit more interest, pay a bit less for electricity. And that's just an individual that doesn't have access to capital in the same rates that a corporate would and is not generating electricity at utility scale. 

So, what it does suggest is from an affordability perspective, it is affordable already, certainly for the large users of electricity to transition, if it is affordable for an individual.

24:51: Insights from COP28

IR: The final part of this episode touches on a global approach to sustainability, through the lens of COP28. 

Sam and the Investec Sustainability team attended the event, so I asked her what insights she gleaned. 

Sam, one of the outcomes was a decision to create a fund that could help countries like South Africa address its energy crisis. 

Would this help South Africa play its part in reducing greenhouse emissions? 

The developing world or the developed countries, you know, spend the money and we pick up the tab from a climate change perspective on the continent.

SM: So first, quite interestingly, was to hear that we're currently calling it the Loss and Damage Fund, but the name still needs to be confirmed as the US doesn't like loss and damage. 

But I think whatever you call it, I think it's a step in the right direction. It's not the first year that this is coming up. So, while there are pledges and we're really happy that, you know, there was consensus, I think within the first 15 minutes or something, we'd like to see the commitment. And once we have the commitment, how can we better use it? 

Of course, this is going to reduce our reliance on coal, and fund our transition as South Africa. That's what we would be able to use it for. 

But I think there's another challenge that comes from that for ourselves. How are we, as South Africa, going to ensure that we're using the funds effectively? How are we going to make sure that they're being managed appropriately? And then, of course, I'm going to bring it up again, that the transition is fair for everyone.

26:30: Closing comments

IR: There is, of course, still a long way to go for South Africa. Not just in creating a sustainable energy industry, but one that's also equitable. 

We're just at the start of what will no doubt be a long and difficult journey, but we have a good roadmap, the right focus, and don't forget that good old South African resilience.

CP: So unfortunately, loadshedding is with us for a while. But ramping renewables is the right thing to do. It's the correct thing to do in terms of the just energy transition.

JM: I think there's a lot of things that we can look at that are moving, that are very positive. We've got to really focus on implementation and not get too caught up in saying, you know, everything is burning and that we've got so many problems. 

SM: It will lead to massive energy efficiency and, a modernised grid. So, people will not have to worry about loadshedding. We will have cleaner air, we'll have energy security, we'll have green jobs and a sustainable future.

IR: Thanks for listening to this episode of The Current, brought to you by Investec Focus Radio. This is episode one of 10 episodes where we’ll have in-depth discussions about the state of energy in South Africa, what the future holds and what a just energy transition looks like. 

To make sure you don’t miss an episode, follow Investec Focus Radio SA wherever you listen to your podcasts. And if you enjoyed this episode, please rate it, leave a comment and forward it to your friends and colleagues. 

Disclaimer

The information furnished in this report, brochure, document, material, or communication (“the Communication”), has been prepared by Investec Bank Limited, acting through its Investec Corporate and Institutional Banking division (herein referred to as “Investec”). This Communication does not constitute: a research recommendation, investment, legal, tax or other advice; and is not to be relied upon in making an investment or other decision. The intended recipients should consider the information contained herein to be objective and independent of the interests of the trading and sales desk concerned. Opinions and any other content including data and market commentary in this Communication are provided for information purposes only. 

The information contained herein has been obtained, where required, from various sources believed to be reliable and may include facts relating to current events or prevailing market conditions as at the date of this Communication, which conditions may change without notification to Investec and/or the recipient.  This is a summary of relevant information and should not be considered as complete. 

This Communication may not be considered as “advice” as contemplated in the Financial Market Act, 19 of 2012 and/or the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 37 of 2002 as it does not take into account your financial position or needs. Please note that Investec provides products or services to you other than financial products or financial services that are not regulated under FAIS and therefore you may not be afforded the same protections in respect of those additional products or services that may apply in respect of the provision of financial products or services in terms of FAIS.

This Communication may also not be seen as an offer to enter into or conclude any transactions.  In relation to the information Investec does not guarantee the accuracy and/or completeness thereof and accepts no liability in relation thereto. 

You should make your own independent evaluation of the relevance and adequacy of the information contained herein and make such other investigations as you deem necessary, including, where relevant, obtaining independent financial advice, before participating in any transaction in respect of the securities referred to in this document.

Any opinions, forecasts or estimates herein constitute the personal judgement of the party who compiled this Communication as at the date of this document. Thus, this Communication reflects the different assumptions, views and analytical methods of the specific individual/party who prepared this Communication. As such, there can be no guarantee that future results or events will be consistent with any such opinions, forecasts or estimates. 

Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied is made regarding future performance. 

There may be risks associated with the information, products or securities, including the risk of loss of any capital amounts invested or traded due to market fluctuations.

There is no obligation of any kind on Investec or any of its Affiliates to update this Communication or any of the information, opinions, forecasts or estimates contained herein. 

This Communication is confidential for the information of the addressee only and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor shall it be copied, redistributed or circulated, or disclosed to another unintended party, without the prior written consent of the relevant entity within Investec. In the event that you contact any representative of Investec or any party in connection with the receipt of this Communication, you should be advised that this disclaimer applies to any subsequent oral conversation or correspondence that occurs as a result of this Communication. 

Any subsequent business you choose to transact shall be subject to the relevant terms and conditions thereof. 

Neither Investec nor any officer or employee thereof accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this Communication or its contents. 

Investec Corporate and Institutional Banking is a division of Investec Bank Limited registration number 1969/004763/06, an Authorised Financial Services Provider (11750), a Registered Credit Provider (NCRCP 9), an authorised Over the Counter Derivatives Provider, and a member of the JSE. Investec is committed to the Code of Banking Practice as regulated by the Ombudsman for Banking Services. Copies of the Code and the Ombudsman's details are available on request or visit Investec COBP.